Following my previous post regarding the Parish Council elections, Iâ€™d like to proffer my thanks to Alan Twist for his concise comments.Â Alan, please accept my apologies for the false supposition that the Solar Farm was the driving force behind the collaborative efforts of St Mellion Park.Â I did hear rumours of the precept issue but discarded it because IÂ didn’tÂ feel the facts supported it.Â Iâ€™ll try to set out my reasons for arriving at that conclusion.
Firstly, you state that St Mellion Park houses are rated at Band H.Â This is partially correct but for the sake of completeness, here are the actual bandings for St Mellion Park.
Unfortunately I did this exercise after obtaining precept details from the council for only Band H properties in the parish.Â Suffice to say, the Band G properties pay less than Band H.Â The following table shows the current St Mellion Band H precept and the Cornwall county average for Band H.
|St Mellion Band H Annual Precept
|Average Cornwall County Band H Precept
St Mellionâ€™s precept is approximately 21% of the county average for Band H property owners.Â To put it another way, the six highest banded properties in St Mellion Park contribute less than Â£0.56 each per week to the parish.Â This seems unworthy of the term â€œlionâ€™s shareâ€.
In your comment you expressed concern that St Mellion Park residents were paying for projects that mainly benefited the village.Â Do you have any examples of these projects?Â I do my best to follow parish matters butÂ I’mÂ not aware of a single parish project, current or proposed.Â I presume that if such plans existed, the incumbent parish council would have raised the precept last year to accommodate them.Â They did not.Â Iâ€™d also like to point out that despite its unique characteristics; St Mellion Park is part of the very village you express distaste at contributing towards. Â St Mellion village (and indeed parish) lacks many of the facilities available to other parishes. Â In fact the only parish asset I’m aware of is a granite seat located across the A388 from the Coryton Arms and the small patch of grass it occupies.
Prior to the election, the five candidates representing St Mellion Park distributed a flier around the parish, it included the following manifesto statement:-
â€œOur objective during the coming electoral period is to reflect the interests of the parish and to utilize any resources for the benefit of all the residents of St Mellion.â€
This statement seems completely at odds with the objective stated in your comment of preventing Band H precepts from rising in St Mellion Park.Â I appreciate though that your views are your own and might not be those of the candidates representing you.
Despite my points above, I fully understand your desire to have representation on the parish council.Â St Mellion Park is a significant component of the parish and has every right to representation.Â In your comment you express surprise at four candidates responding to a request to represent St Mellion Park.Â Four would have given them, not only representation, but majority control over the parish council.Â This begs the question as to why St Mellion Park then co-opted a fifth candidate and was declined by a sixth.Â This suggests that mere representation was never the objective.Â St Mellion Park sought, and indeed achieved, complete control.